What’s a waiver? – Loukidelis PC

From John Sorenson’s comment on Remtilla (2015 TCC 200) in Canadian Tax Highlights 23:9 (Sep 2015):

The TCC confirmed that waivers of the normal reassessment period are typically filed in prescribed form, but that a waiver can be in another form as long as prescribed information is provided and the document is intended to be a waiver. For example, the TCC noted that the FCA had held that a letter to the CRA was a waiver and that the CRA must treat any document as a waiver if it includes the necessary information. The TCC said that whether a waiver was filed requires an objective determination of the parties’ intentions and any relevant circumstances.

Justice Miller makes the following additional comments about waivers (at ¶¶33–36):

The onus is on the Minister to prove that a taxpayer has filed a waiver for a year (Fietz v R, 2011 TCC 493).
Per Fietz, a waiver can be valid although it does not specify the scope of the waiver if the scope can be gleaned from other relevant documents (such as a proposal letter).
A court interpreting a waiver will ascertain the intention of the parties as expressed in the waiver together with other relevant circumstances for which evidence is available (Solberg (SJ) v Canada, [1992] 2 CTC 208 (FCTD)).
The standard for determining a taxpayer’s intention in a waiver “is from the perspective of the objective reasonable bystander”, which is a concept from contract law (Noran West Developments Ltd v R, 2012 TCC 434).

Sale of shares on income account

In Rudolph v R, 2024 TCC 148, the Tax Court held that the taxpayer had not disposed of shares in 2007 as alleged by the CRA. Instead, the taxpayer had received a loan from the purchaser in 2007 that was…

Deemed proceeds of an asset

In 0808414 B.C. Ltd. v R, 2024 TCC 99, the taxpayer sold equipment to a non-arm’s length purchaser as part of a transaction that also transferred employees and obligations under a pension and benefits plan. The CRA reassessed on the…

Trust beneficiary liability under s 160

In Barwicz v R, 2024 CCI 93, the Tax Court held that a beneficiary of a trust was liable under section 160 for its unpaid tax to the extent of capital distributions received from the trust. Subsection 107(2), which provides…

Fraudulent conveyances

In Ontario Securities Commission v Camerlengo Holdings Inc., 2023 ONCA 93, the OSC brought a claim under s 2 of the Fraudulent Conveyances Act (Ontario) (the “FCA”) against a husband and wife. The husband and wife convinced a judge to…

Purported shareholder loan repayments treated as income

In Kumar v R, 2024 TCC 105 (informal procedure), the Court found that the CRA had properly reassessed the appellant to include in his income payments to him and his son made by a corporation to which the appellant had…