New forms
Fighting Aggression
What in the world?
What world does the CRA live in that it could think it would be a good idea to take a 78-year-old woman to Court under section 160 for cashing cheques for her disabled son? See Gambino v. The Queen, 2008 TCC 601.
CDA
The capital dividend account of a corporation (“CDA”) is defined in subsection 89(1) of the Income Tax Act (Canada), and the definition requires that the balance of the account be calculated using something like the following formula:
A + B + C + D + E + F + G – H
Process
The CRA and the Crown like to say (or at least sometimes they act as if), in the objection and Tax Court appeal process, all that matters is whether the assessment in issue is correct. Justice J.E. Hershfield, in Wood v. The Queen, 2008 TCC 105, begged to differ.
Failure to File Penalty
Subsection 162(2.1) of the Income Tax Act provides for a penalty for a non-resident corporation that fails to file a return and that it is liable to a penalty under subsections 162(1) or (2). The penalties provided by the latter subsections are computed as a percentage of tax payable. What happens if no tax is payable and so no penalty is applicable under the latter subsections? Does the 162(2.1) penalty still apply?
De-registered
The CRA has revoked the status of two more charities that had participated in tax shelters.