Budget bill
The Exemption
Crazy
In an article I wrote about three years ago, I pointed out that the purveyors of tax snake oil seemed to be having some success convincing their “clients” that they need not pay income tax.
HLA Paper on Trusts and Estates
New forms
Fighting Aggression
What in the world?
What world does the CRA live in that it could think it would be a good idea to take a 78-year-old woman to Court under section 160 for cashing cheques for her disabled son? See Gambino v. The Queen, 2008 TCC 601.
CDA
The capital dividend account of a corporation (“CDA”) is defined in subsection 89(1) of the Income Tax Act (Canada), and the definition requires that the balance of the account be calculated using something like the following formula:
A + B + C + D + E + F + G – H
Process
The CRA and the Crown like to say (or at least sometimes they act as if), in the objection and Tax Court appeal process, all that matters is whether the assessment in issue is correct. Justice J.E. Hershfield, in Wood v. The Queen, 2008 TCC 105, begged to differ.