• Skip to main navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Loukidelis PC

Loukidelis PC

Effective. Accessible. Responsive

  • Services
  • Team
  • LPC Notes
  • Articles
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Skip to menu toggle button

LPC Notes (page 29)

Section 160 butterflies

Posted on: September 16, 2019 Last updated on: March 2, 2020 Written by: John Loukidelis
In Eyeball Networks Inc. v R, 2019 TCC 150, the court held that section 160 applied to a transferee corporation (the new operating company or “TC”) that had received property from a distributing corporation (the old operating company or “DC”)…
Continue reading “Section 160 butterflies”…

Bitcoin mining

Posted on: August 29, 2019 Last updated on: August 29, 2019 Written by: John Loukidelis
The CRA, in technical interpretation 2018-0776661I7 (August 8, 2019), takes the position that a Bitcoin miner receives Bitcoin as barter for services rendered. The transaction is a barter transaction because Bitcoin isn’t legal tender (see IT-490 “Barter Transactions”). The receipt…
Continue reading “Bitcoin mining”…

Handing over records to CRA

Posted on: August 27, 2019 Last updated on: August 27, 2019 Written by: John Loukidelis
Clients sometimes complain to me that they have given records to a CRA auditor who then returns only some of the records or returns them in a disorganized state that makes them difficult to work with. Accordingly, if a client…
Continue reading “Handing over records to CRA”…

Employee parking pass

Posted on: July 26, 2019 Last updated on: July 26, 2019 Written by: John Loukidelis
Amit Ummat summarizes Smith v R, 2019 FCA 173, in which the Court held that a flight attendant received a taxable benefit from an employer-provided parking pass.
Continue reading “Employee parking pass”…

Director resignations

Posted on: July 19, 2019 Last updated on: July 19, 2019 Written by: John Loukidelis

In Singh v R, 2019 TCC 120, the taxpayer had been assessed as a director of a corporation for its unremitted HST. The issue considered by the Court was whether, as the taxpayer claimed, he had resigned more than two years before the date of the assessment in issue (per subsection 323(5) of the Excise Tax Act).

Continue reading “Director resignations”…

Trust miscellania

Posted on: July 13, 2019 Last updated on: July 13, 2019 Written by: John Loukidelis
Some points of interest from a recent CRA technical interpretation (2017-0683021I7, June 8, 2018) respecting a reorganization involving a trust with non-resident beneficiaries: The trustees of a trust purported to add a ULC as a beneficiary. The CRA, however, noted…
Continue reading “Trust miscellania”…

Five-year test when no related individual

Posted on: July 13, 2019 Last updated on: July 13, 2019 Written by: John Loukidelis
An employee who works in a business on a full-time basis (ie more than an average of 20 hours per week) for five or more years will not be subject to TOSI even where the years occurred before the TOSI…
Continue reading “Five-year test when no related individual”…

Employee discounts

Posted on: July 13, 2019 Last updated on: July 13, 2019 Written by: John Loukidelis
the CRA acknowledges that its administrative position on employee discount programs is that an employee may exclude from income discounts on merchandise and commissions from personal purchases, but that administrative position does not…
Continue reading “Employee discounts”…

Dividends to a trust and Part VI.1 tax

Posted on: July 10, 2019 Last updated on: July 13, 2019 Written by: John Loukidelis
Opco wishes to redeem low-low preference shares held by a family trust, which proposes to allocate the resulting deemed dividend to a beneficiaryco (Benco). Will Part VI.1 tax apply to Opco? If the preference shares are subject to a price…
Continue reading “Dividends to a trust and Part VI.1 tax”…

TOSI and rental income

Posted on: July 10, 2019 Last updated on: July 10, 2019 Written by: John Loukidelis
Mr X owns the voting shares of Holdco that owns a rental property. His two kids own non-voting shares that on which Holdco pays dividends. Does the TOSI apply to dividends paid to the kids? Is the rental operation a…
Continue reading “TOSI and rental income”…
« Previous page 1 … 27 28 29 30 31 … 107 Next page »

Archives

Categories

Recent notes

Canada Child Benefit and Shared Custody

In Wong v R, 2025 TCC 24 (informal procedure), Mr Justice Bocock provided a helpful road map of the surprisingly complicated rules relating to shared custody and entitlement to the Canada Child Benefit.
Continue reading “Canada Child Benefit and Shared Custody”…

Misdirected assessment

Poor Mr Lam trusted his tenant to forward important mail while Mr Lam was out of the country, but the tenant left a 2016 HST assessment in a pile of junk mail. Mr Lam didn’t become aware of the assessment…
Continue reading “Misdirected assessment”…

50-50 shareholders and s 160; directors and independent contractors

McCague v R, 2025 TCC 59, is another section 160 case where 50/50 shareholders caused their corporation to pay them dividends at a time when it owed taxes. The Court held that section 160 applied and summarized the law in…
Continue reading “50-50 shareholders and s 160; directors and independent contractors”…

Preliminary vs preparatory expenses

In Lienaux v R, 2025 TCC 67 (informal procedure), the Court referred to Vesuna v R, 2022 FCA 58, and Gartry v R, 1994 CanLII 19352 (TCC), in denying expenses incurred where the taxpayer had not actually started to carry…
Continue reading “Preliminary vs preparatory expenses”…

Negligence for not reviewing return

In 994552 N.W.T. Ltd. v R, 2025 TCC 55, Mr Justice Bocock considered whether the taxpayer corporation was liable to be reassessed beyond the normal reassessment period for two taxation years and for gross negligence penalties for overclaimed capital cost…
Continue reading “Negligence for not reviewing return”…

Recent Posts

Canada Child Benefit and Shared Custody

In Wong v R, 2025 TCC 24 (informal procedure), Mr Justice Bocock provided a helpful road map of the surprisingly complicated rules relating to shared custody and entitlement to the Canada Child Benefit.
Continue reading “Canada Child Benefit and Shared Custody”…

Misdirected assessment

Poor Mr Lam trusted his tenant to forward important mail while Mr Lam was out of the country, but the tenant left a 2016 HST assessment in a pile of junk mail. Mr Lam didn’t become aware of the assessment…
Continue reading “Misdirected assessment”…

50-50 shareholders and s 160; directors and independent contractors

McCague v R, 2025 TCC 59, is another section 160 case where 50/50 shareholders caused their corporation to pay them dividends at a time when it owed taxes. The Court held that section 160 applied and summarized the law in…
Continue reading “50-50 shareholders and s 160; directors and independent contractors”…

Preliminary vs preparatory expenses

In Lienaux v R, 2025 TCC 67 (informal procedure), the Court referred to Vesuna v R, 2022 FCA 58, and Gartry v R, 1994 CanLII 19352 (TCC), in denying expenses incurred where the taxpayer had not actually started to carry…
Continue reading “Preliminary vs preparatory expenses”…

Negligence for not reviewing return

In 994552 N.W.T. Ltd. v R, 2025 TCC 55, Mr Justice Bocock considered whether the taxpayer corporation was liable to be reassessed beyond the normal reassessment period for two taxation years and for gross negligence penalties for overclaimed capital cost…
Continue reading “Negligence for not reviewing return”…

Archives

Categories

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

About this site

Click here for an important disclaimer about this site.

Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

Canada Child Benefit and Shared Custody

In Wong v R, 2025 TCC 24 (informal procedure), Mr Justice Bocock provided a helpful road map of the surprisingly complicated rules relating to shared custody and entitlement to the Canada Child Benefit.
Continue reading “Canada Child Benefit and Shared Custody”…

Misdirected assessment

Poor Mr Lam trusted his tenant to forward important mail while Mr Lam was out of the country, but the tenant left a 2016 HST assessment in a pile of junk mail. Mr Lam didn’t become aware of the assessment…
Continue reading “Misdirected assessment”…

50-50 shareholders and s 160; directors and independent contractors

McCague v R, 2025 TCC 59, is another section 160 case where 50/50 shareholders caused their corporation to pay them dividends at a time when it owed taxes. The Court held that section 160 applied and summarized the law in…
Continue reading “50-50 shareholders and s 160; directors and independent contractors”…

Preliminary vs preparatory expenses

In Lienaux v R, 2025 TCC 67 (informal procedure), the Court referred to Vesuna v R, 2022 FCA 58, and Gartry v R, 1994 CanLII 19352 (TCC), in denying expenses incurred where the taxpayer had not actually started to carry…
Continue reading “Preliminary vs preparatory expenses”…

Negligence for not reviewing return

In 994552 N.W.T. Ltd. v R, 2025 TCC 55, Mr Justice Bocock considered whether the taxpayer corporation was liable to be reassessed beyond the normal reassessment period for two taxation years and for gross negligence penalties for overclaimed capital cost…
Continue reading “Negligence for not reviewing return”…

© Loukidelis Professional Corporation