• Skip to main navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Loukidelis PC

Loukidelis PC

Effective. Accessible. Responsive

  • Services
  • Team
  • LPC Notes
  • Articles
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Skip to menu toggle button

LPC Notes (page 45)

55(2) and creditor-proofing

Posted on: February 15, 2016 Last updated on: February 15, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
The new purpose tests in section 55 make creditor proofing problematic. The 55(3)(a) exception remains, however, for deemed dividends. Perhaps it’s possible, then, to achieve creditor proofing by engaging in a 55(3)(a) butterfly. Not so fast. The CRA’s comments at…
Continue reading “55(2) and creditor-proofing”…

45(3) elections and the principal residence exemption

Posted on: February 13, 2016 Last updated on: February 13, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
If you buy a home and then change its use, should you always file the 45(3) election to defer any gain? Maybe not, according to James Painter, “Principal-Residence Tax-Deferral Election May Be Inadvisable” (Feb 2016) 6:1 Canadian Tax Focus. Mr…
Continue reading “45(3) elections and the principal residence exemption”…

Employee theft

Posted on: February 13, 2016 Last updated on: February 13, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
Mark Tonkovich, “Theft by Owners or Senior Employees: Deductibility of Losses” (Feb 2016) 6:1 Canadian Tax Focus, analyzes employee theft as discussed in Income Tax Folio S3-F9-C1, “Lottery Winnings, Miscellaneous Receipts, and Income (and Losses) from Crime”. The Folio sets…
Continue reading “Employee theft”…

Section 160 and shareholder benefits

Posted on: February 13, 2016 Last updated on: February 13, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
Can the Minister assess a taxpayer under section 160 in respect of an amount already included in the taxpayer’s income under subsection 15(1)? From Justice Bocock, in Parihar v R, 2015 TCC 52 at ¶45: shareholder who has been…
Continue reading “Section 160 and shareholder benefits”…

Unpaid income tax and bankruptcy

Posted on: February 11, 2016 Last updated on: February 11, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
In Schnier v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 ONCA 5, the Court held that an amount of tax owing (about $4.4 million) was a contingent claim because the relevant assessments were under appeal to the Tax Court. As a result, the…
Continue reading “Unpaid income tax and bankruptcy”…

A simpler T1135

Posted on: February 8, 2016 Last updated on: February 8, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
My thanks to Fred Buzzelli, who sent me a link to a good article by Gabe Hayos on the simplified T1135.
Continue reading “A simpler T1135”…

Are step children related?

Posted on: February 2, 2016 Last updated on: February 2, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
Mr X and Ms Y are common law partners. Each of them has a son from a previous relationship. Are the sons related for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada)? The CRA says “yes” because the step brothers…
Continue reading “Are step children related?”…

Misrepresentation

Posted on: January 27, 2016 Last updated on: January 27, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
From Justice Bocock, in Robertson v R, 2015 TCC 246, we read the following regarding whether a mistake of law amounts to a negligent misrepresentation: wise and prudent person is, generally by definition, not unknowledgeable of the law. However,…
Continue reading “Misrepresentation”…

No refund for you

Posted on: January 27, 2016 Last updated on: January 27, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
A corporate payor doesn’t get a refund if it pays a dividend but fails to file its tax return for the year within three years. But at least RDTOH isn’t reduced either. See Dino Infanti, “FCA Agrees: Dividend Refund Timed…
Continue reading “No refund for you”…

55(2) This Week

Posted on: January 27, 2016 Last updated on: January 27, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
Manu Kakkar and Marissa Halil, in “Subsection 55(2): The CRA’s Recent Positions” Tax for the Owner-Manager 16:1 (January 2016), provide a useful summary of the CRA’s pronouncements on 55(2) at the Tax Foundation conference. The CRA is concerned that deliberately…
Continue reading “55(2) This Week”…
« Previous page 1 … 43 44 45 46 47 … 107 Next page »

Archives

Categories

Recent notes

Canada Child Benefit and Shared Custody

In Wong v R, 2025 TCC 24 (informal procedure), Mr Justice Bocock provided a helpful road map of the surprisingly complicated rules relating to shared custody and entitlement to the Canada Child Benefit.
Continue reading “Canada Child Benefit and Shared Custody”…

Misdirected assessment

Poor Mr Lam trusted his tenant to forward important mail while Mr Lam was out of the country, but the tenant left a 2016 HST assessment in a pile of junk mail. Mr Lam didn’t become aware of the assessment…
Continue reading “Misdirected assessment”…

50-50 shareholders and s 160; directors and independent contractors

McCague v R, 2025 TCC 59, is another section 160 case where 50/50 shareholders caused their corporation to pay them dividends at a time when it owed taxes. The Court held that section 160 applied and summarized the law in…
Continue reading “50-50 shareholders and s 160; directors and independent contractors”…

Preliminary vs preparatory expenses

In Lienaux v R, 2025 TCC 67 (informal procedure), the Court referred to Vesuna v R, 2022 FCA 58, and Gartry v R, 1994 CanLII 19352 (TCC), in denying expenses incurred where the taxpayer had not actually started to carry…
Continue reading “Preliminary vs preparatory expenses”…

Negligence for not reviewing return

In 994552 N.W.T. Ltd. v R, 2025 TCC 55, Mr Justice Bocock considered whether the taxpayer corporation was liable to be reassessed beyond the normal reassessment period for two taxation years and for gross negligence penalties for overclaimed capital cost…
Continue reading “Negligence for not reviewing return”…

Recent Posts

Canada Child Benefit and Shared Custody

In Wong v R, 2025 TCC 24 (informal procedure), Mr Justice Bocock provided a helpful road map of the surprisingly complicated rules relating to shared custody and entitlement to the Canada Child Benefit.
Continue reading “Canada Child Benefit and Shared Custody”…

Misdirected assessment

Poor Mr Lam trusted his tenant to forward important mail while Mr Lam was out of the country, but the tenant left a 2016 HST assessment in a pile of junk mail. Mr Lam didn’t become aware of the assessment…
Continue reading “Misdirected assessment”…

50-50 shareholders and s 160; directors and independent contractors

McCague v R, 2025 TCC 59, is another section 160 case where 50/50 shareholders caused their corporation to pay them dividends at a time when it owed taxes. The Court held that section 160 applied and summarized the law in…
Continue reading “50-50 shareholders and s 160; directors and independent contractors”…

Preliminary vs preparatory expenses

In Lienaux v R, 2025 TCC 67 (informal procedure), the Court referred to Vesuna v R, 2022 FCA 58, and Gartry v R, 1994 CanLII 19352 (TCC), in denying expenses incurred where the taxpayer had not actually started to carry…
Continue reading “Preliminary vs preparatory expenses”…

Negligence for not reviewing return

In 994552 N.W.T. Ltd. v R, 2025 TCC 55, Mr Justice Bocock considered whether the taxpayer corporation was liable to be reassessed beyond the normal reassessment period for two taxation years and for gross negligence penalties for overclaimed capital cost…
Continue reading “Negligence for not reviewing return”…

Archives

Categories

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

About this site

Click here for an important disclaimer about this site.

Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

Canada Child Benefit and Shared Custody

In Wong v R, 2025 TCC 24 (informal procedure), Mr Justice Bocock provided a helpful road map of the surprisingly complicated rules relating to shared custody and entitlement to the Canada Child Benefit.
Continue reading “Canada Child Benefit and Shared Custody”…

Misdirected assessment

Poor Mr Lam trusted his tenant to forward important mail while Mr Lam was out of the country, but the tenant left a 2016 HST assessment in a pile of junk mail. Mr Lam didn’t become aware of the assessment…
Continue reading “Misdirected assessment”…

50-50 shareholders and s 160; directors and independent contractors

McCague v R, 2025 TCC 59, is another section 160 case where 50/50 shareholders caused their corporation to pay them dividends at a time when it owed taxes. The Court held that section 160 applied and summarized the law in…
Continue reading “50-50 shareholders and s 160; directors and independent contractors”…

Preliminary vs preparatory expenses

In Lienaux v R, 2025 TCC 67 (informal procedure), the Court referred to Vesuna v R, 2022 FCA 58, and Gartry v R, 1994 CanLII 19352 (TCC), in denying expenses incurred where the taxpayer had not actually started to carry…
Continue reading “Preliminary vs preparatory expenses”…

Negligence for not reviewing return

In 994552 N.W.T. Ltd. v R, 2025 TCC 55, Mr Justice Bocock considered whether the taxpayer corporation was liable to be reassessed beyond the normal reassessment period for two taxation years and for gross negligence penalties for overclaimed capital cost…
Continue reading “Negligence for not reviewing return”…

© Loukidelis Professional Corporation