Budget bill
White collar revisited
DIY Prescribed Rate
The Income Tax Act in numerous places requires interest to be paid, either by the taxpayer or the Minister, on certain overdue amounts. The rate applicable is computed by reference to the “prescribed rate”. The Act also provides for calculating certain kinds of benefits by reference to that same rate. The rate fluctuates each calendar quarter. Usually, the CRA publishes the rate on its website well in advance of each quarter. For some reason, however, the CRA has still not published the rate for 2010 Q3. What is a poor tax adviser to do?
Exida.com Appeal Dismissed
In Exida.Com Limited Liability Company v. The Queen, 2010 FCA 159, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal of the taxpayer from the decision of Justice Woods (see “Contradiction“). The Federal Court of Appeal’s reasoning is surprising and, perhaps, disturbing.
Current cases
Retiring allowance exception
In Rae v. The Queen, 2010 TCC 130, the taxpayer left his position as the controller of one corporation and joined another. Soon after he started his new employment, he discovered what he thought were serious improprieties in the financial statements and accounting practices of his new employer. He resigned his position but then negotiated a settlement under which he received a large payment for negligent misrepresentation and as damages for retaliation. The CRA took the position that the entire amount received was a retiring allowance. The taxpayer appealed; the Tax Court agreed with him in part.
Why Multiple Classes?
Proceeds of Crime
The following article appeared in a recent edition of the Hamilton Law Association Law Journal.
The police execute a search at your client’s house. They find pot plants and a large amount of cash. They seize the cash and charge your client with trafficking, and he is later convicted of that crime.
Assessments
In Danso-Coffey v. Ontario, 2010 ONCA 171, the Ontario Court of Appeal considered whether Ontario could assess and collect tax from an individual who was supposedly a director of a corporation when, it turned out, she wasn’t. The Court concluded that Ontario could assess and collect the tax if the individual failed to follow the appropriate procedures in the Retail Sales Tax Act (the “RSTA”) for disputing the assessment.