Every now and then I can’t resist a little legal humour. The following joke is relayed by the law blog Sui Generis:
Harmony
Loss Utilization That Doesn’t Work
Consider the position of Lossco and Profitco, each a wholly-owned sub of Parentco, where one has non-capital losses in a year equal to the taxable income of the other in that same year. Between them, they have not earned profits, but the Income Tax Act requires Profitco to pay taxes anyway because the Act does not permit related corporations to file consolidated returns. What to do?
Valid Appeals and Objections
The Tax Court, in Kubbernus v. The Queen, 2009 TCC 311, confirmed that a taxpayer cannot file an appeal to the Court for a reassessment issued at the taxpayer’s request pursuant to the taxpayer relief provisions.
Paying dividends with a note
In a post I wrote last year, I stated
According to the CRA, it is not necessary to use cash to pay the dividend. A corporation can pay a dividend using a note, but the payee must accept the note as absolute payment of the dividend.
Transfers of insurance
I’ve seen a number of transactions lately where the owner of a life insurance policy proposes to transfer it to a corporation controlled by the owner. The benefits of corporate-owned insurance are well-known, of course, but such a transfer could also permit the owner to withdraw significant amounts of money from the corporation tax free.
Related Business
Death Benefits or Not
When is a ‘death benefit’ not a ‘death benefit’? Apparently, when it is a benefit received under the Canada Pension Plan.