The CRA continues to talk tough on donation tax shelter schemes. And why shouldn’t it? Its boast that “In 2008, Canadian courts have continued to confirm the CRA’s position with respect to these schemes” is accurate. What I find disturbing…
“Tax tip”
“Did you know… That you should notify the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) when directors of your corporation change?”
Ways and Means ’08
“Government of Canada Moves Quickly on Seniors’ Tax Relief and Other Outstanding Measures“. But can the government act quickly enough?
EBay released
eBay Canada Ltd. v. Canada (National Revenue), 2008 FCA 348 is now available on CanLII. The Court held that information on servers in the U.S. is not foreign-based information.
Non-competes, again
Thursday last I tried, once again, to explain the restrictive covenant rules in proposed section 56.4 of the Income Tax Act (Canada) to a seminar hosted by the Hamilton Law Association (please send an email to me if you would like a copy of the PowerPoint presentation). I’m not sure how well I succeeded. I find the rules difficult to work with and impossible to explain because they are so full of apparently random tricks and traps.
Dividends and Section 160
Assume that Corp X owes tax to the CRA. Assume that, while it owes that tax, Corp X pays a dividend to Mr. X who deals not at arm’s length with the corporation. What can the CRA do about it…
Procedure
In Corsi v. The Queen, 2008 TCC 472, the CRA sent a 160 assessment to the taxpayer by registered mail in June, 2004, to her home address, which was not the address the CRA had on file for the taxpayer. For whatever reason, the taxpayer didn’t pick up the mail, and it was returned to the CRA. The CRA did nothing more with the assessment, but some time thereafter CRA Collections started calling the taxpayer. This was the first she heard about the assessment. The CRA then mailed a copy of the assessment to the taxpayer’s accountant in October, 2005, more than one year and 90 days after the first assessment was supposedly sent.
Mutual fund tax bomb?
Someone forwarded to me an email from a local accountant who was warning his clients who own mutual funds about large capital gains distributions that funds will be required to make at the end of this year because of record redemptions of units during the recent market slide.
Michigan taxes
Michael Van Severen, who is a member of the cross-border tax services group at KPMG in Hamilton, was kind enough to forward to me a “Tax Tip-Off” (I thought it said “Tax Rip-Off” when I first received it). The tip…
Directors and revival, again
In Leger v. The Queen, 2007 TCC 322 (which I discussed here) the Court held that the dissolution of a corporation that was later revived did not engage the two-year limitation period otherwise applicable under subsection 227.1(4) of the Income Tax Act. Mr. Justice Bowie arrived at a different conclusion in Aujla v. The Queen, 2007 TCC 764, in respect of a company under the British Columbia Company Act.