Category: 160

Peter Enns, a tax debtor, designated his wife, Marlene, as the sole beneficiary of his RRSP. Peter died without paying his tax debt, and so the CRA assessed Marlene under section 160 on the basis that she was Peter’s “spouse”…

In Barwicz v R, 2024 CCI 93, the Tax Court held that a beneficiary of a trust was liable under section 160 for its unpaid tax to the extent of capital distributions received from the trust. Subsection 107(2), which provides…

In Vasilkioti v R, 2024 TCC 101, the Court held that section 160 did not apply in respect of a transfer of real property from a husband to the appellant-wife because the CRA did not adequately prove the husband’s underlying…

In Active Asset Management Inc. v R, 2024 TCC 87, the Court held that neither a deemed dividend arising on a stated capital increase nor a dividend satisfied by a promissory note constituted a transfer of property for the purposes…

Neal Armstrong (taxinterpretations.com) reports that, in Barwicz v R, 2024 CCI 93 (French only), the Court held that, for the purposes of section 160, a beneficiary of a discretionary trust had not given consideration for distributions of capital property from…

In Pillon v R, 2024 FCA 24, the Court upheld a Tax Court finding that the taxpayer “acted in concert” with a tax debtor to whom she was not related so that section 160 applied. The taxpayer and the tax…

In Kiperchuk v R, 2013 TCC 60, the Tax Court held that a widow was not the “spouse” of her deceased husband. In Enns v R, 2023 TCC 28, however, the Court followed Kuchta v R, 2015 TCC 289, and…

The appellant in Veilleux c R, 2022 CCI 69, was one of two unrelated individuals who were the 50/50 shareholders and only directors of Opco. The CRA assessed the appellant under section 160 for Opco’s unpaid tax debts in respect…