Freeze Shares
The following article appeared in the latest edition of the Hamilton Law Association Law Journal.
Valuation redux
In a post I wrote about a year ago, I complained about the CRA’s then-recent pronouncements on control premiums. The CRA, at the most recent Canadian Tax Foundation BC Conference, recanted this position, at least in part, as follows:
Offsetting Shareholder Benefits
In Coutre v. The Queen, 2009 TCC 456, the taxpayer tried to argue that, if an assessment under subsection 15(1) is made against a shareholder, then the Minister, to prevent double taxation, must reduce the benefit by the amount of any outstanding shareholder loan.
Loss Utilization That Doesn’t Work
Consider the position of Lossco and Profitco, each a wholly-owned sub of Parentco, where one has non-capital losses in a year equal to the taxable income of the other in that same year. Between them, they have not earned profits, but the Income Tax Act requires Profitco to pay taxes anyway because the Act does not permit related corporations to file consolidated returns. What to do?
Paying dividends with a note
In a post I wrote last year, I stated
According to the CRA, it is not necessary to use cash to pay the dividend. A corporation can pay a dividend using a note, but the payee must accept the note as absolute payment of the dividend.
Transfers of insurance
I’ve seen a number of transactions lately where the owner of a life insurance policy proposes to transfer it to a corporation controlled by the owner. The benefits of corporate-owned insurance are well-known, of course, but such a transfer could also permit the owner to withdraw significant amounts of money from the corporation tax free.