The Ontario Ministry of Government Services (MGS), it appears, seems to believe that the sole director of a corporation cannot resign and leave the corporation without directors. The MGS will refuse to amend the public record for a corporation to show that it doesn’t have any directors if the sole director attempts to resign.
Childcare receipts
A casual reading of subsection 63(1) of the Income Tax Act suggests that a taxpayer claiming childcare expenses is required to produce receipts from the person providing the care. The subsection seems to permit the deduction of expenses “the payment of which is proven by filing with the Minister one or more receipts each of which was issued by the payee and contains, where the payee is an individual, that individual’s Social Insurance Number”.
“Received”
In Morrison v. The Queen, 2010 TCC 429 (an informal procedure appeal), the individual taxpayers were employees of a corporation of which they were the controlling shareholders. The corporation purported to pay salary to the taxpayers by remitting amounts on account of source deductions to CRA and crediting the appropriate balance to the shareholders’ loan accounts. The taxpayers, however, didn’t include any amounts in income for the year in which the credits and remittances were made. The CRA reassessed to include all amounts credited and remitted in income; the taxpayers appealed to the Tax Court of Canada.
Antle and Garron
The Federal Court of Appeal has released its reasons for dismissing the appeal of the taxpayer in Antle. See Antle v. The Queen, 2010 FCA 280. The reasons are also now available online in St. Michael Trust Corp. v. The…
Purity
Yesterday, I presented my paper on “Purifications” and the capital gain exemption to the Hamilton Law Association’s corporate commercial seminar.
Some Big Numbers on Charity Tax Shelters
Today’s Globe and Mail reports that the CRA has reassessed, or soon will reassess, up to 170,000 Canadians “who have allegedly claimed $5-billion in bogus charitable donations since 2003 by using controversial tax shelter programs.”
Voluntary Disclosures
I’ve just published a permanent page to my blog on voluntary disclosures.
Bad assets
You need to purify a corporation of its bad assets so that the corporation’s shares will be qualified small business corporation shares for the purposes of the $750,000 capital gains exemption. Let’s assume that you are confident about the values of the assets involved, so that you can leave bad assets with a value equal to exactly 10% of the total gross value of all assets of the corporation. How do you calculate the amount to remove, given that what you remove reduces both the gross value of the bad assets and the gross value of all of the assets of the corporation? The following formula seems to work:
Form of notice
In Suffolk v. The Queen, 2010 TCC 295 (an informal procedure case), the Court undertook an interesting review of the caselaw relating to the validity of notices of assessment that contain errors and the form required for a valid notice…
White collar revisited
A few months ago, I wrote a post complaining about how the CRA tends to go after the taxpayers who get the caught in the middle of tax schemes rather than the schemers themselves. Karen Cooper has written an interesting…