Penalties – Page 2 – Loukidelis PC

SCC dismisses Guindon appeal

The Supreme Court has dismissed the taxpayer’s appeal in Guindon v R, 2015 SCC 41.

Continue reading…

Inter-company loans

Subsection 15(1) of the Income Tax Act could apply where Aco loans money to Bco and Bco has no means of repaying the money. On the other hand, subsection 246(1) will not apply where Bco and its shareholder have no…

Continue reading…

Change in use and flipping

The CRA has confirmed that a deemed disposition under subsection 45(1) of the Income Tax Act resulting from a change in use is not a disposition for the purposes of the flipping rules in subsections 12(12) and 12(13). See 2024-1027831C6.

Continue reading…

Swiss bank account trouble

In Azmayesh-Fard v R, 2025 TCC 20, the Court considered whether the CRA had properly reassessed a taxpayer beyond the normal reassessment period and imposed gross negligence penalties for unreported income from a Swiss bank account and for failing to…

Continue reading…

Price adjustment clause

An accounting colleague has reported to me on a CRA audit involving a price adjustment clause. The CRA challenged the valuation used for a transfer of property. The taxpayer and the CRA eventually agreed on a valuation that was about…

Continue reading…

Source of income and the normal reassessment period

In Boles v R, 2024 TCC 167, the taxpayers incurred losses in respect of “Dog Activities” (breeding and selling purebred dogs and attending dog shows) and some rental properties. The Court concluded the CRA could not reassess statute-barred years for…

Continue reading…

Inter-company loans

Subsection 15(1) of the Income Tax Act could apply where Aco loans money to Bco and Bco has no means of repaying the money. On the other hand, subsection 246(1) will not apply where Bco and its shareholder have no…

Continue reading…

Change in use and flipping

The CRA has confirmed that a deemed disposition under subsection 45(1) of the Income Tax Act resulting from a change in use is not a disposition for the purposes of the flipping rules in subsections 12(12) and 12(13). See 2024-1027831C6.

Continue reading…

Swiss bank account trouble

In Azmayesh-Fard v R, 2025 TCC 20, the Court considered whether the CRA had properly reassessed a taxpayer beyond the normal reassessment period and imposed gross negligence penalties for unreported income from a Swiss bank account and for failing to…

Continue reading…

Price adjustment clause

An accounting colleague has reported to me on a CRA audit involving a price adjustment clause. The CRA challenged the valuation used for a transfer of property. The taxpayer and the CRA eventually agreed on a valuation that was about…

Continue reading…

Source of income and the normal reassessment period

In Boles v R, 2024 TCC 167, the taxpayers incurred losses in respect of “Dog Activities” (breeding and selling purebred dogs and attending dog shows) and some rental properties. The Court concluded the CRA could not reassess statute-barred years for…

Continue reading…

Inter-company loans

Subsection 15(1) of the Income Tax Act could apply where Aco loans money to Bco and Bco has no means of repaying the money. On the other hand, subsection 246(1) will not apply where Bco and its shareholder have no…

Continue reading…

Change in use and flipping

The CRA has confirmed that a deemed disposition under subsection 45(1) of the Income Tax Act resulting from a change in use is not a disposition for the purposes of the flipping rules in subsections 12(12) and 12(13). See 2024-1027831C6.

Continue reading…

Swiss bank account trouble

In Azmayesh-Fard v R, 2025 TCC 20, the Court considered whether the CRA had properly reassessed a taxpayer beyond the normal reassessment period and imposed gross negligence penalties for unreported income from a Swiss bank account and for failing to…

Continue reading…

Price adjustment clause

An accounting colleague has reported to me on a CRA audit involving a price adjustment clause. The CRA challenged the valuation used for a transfer of property. The taxpayer and the CRA eventually agreed on a valuation that was about…

Continue reading…

Source of income and the normal reassessment period

In Boles v R, 2024 TCC 167, the taxpayers incurred losses in respect of “Dog Activities” (breeding and selling purebred dogs and attending dog shows) and some rental properties. The Court concluded the CRA could not reassess statute-barred years for…

Continue reading…